"The end game of every single debate on vaccines comes down to the quality of the research" by Ashley Everly
Ashley Everly is a toxicologist, science writer, activist and the mother of a vaccine injured child. She is also the force behind Vaccine Guide and the blog think love healthy. Click here to listen to a very informative interview with Ashley; and keep reading for a post that she recently shared on her Facebook page, about the importance of high quality vaccine safety research; which is vital for anyone considering vaccines for themselves or their children. If you are new to vaccine safety research and not sure where to begin, start here; and be sure read the recently published, very comprehensive well written, well referenced, "How To End the Autism Epidemic" by J. B. Handley.
The following post appeared on Ashley Everly's Facebook page on November 14, 2018. Thank you Ashley for another great post and for all that you do to protect children and families from the harm and heartache that vaccines can and do cause.
The end game of every single debate on vaccines comes down to the quality of the research.
The pro-vaccine side absolutely cannot disagree that there is a great deal of research that calls into question the safety and efficacy of vaccines.
What they will do, however, is discredit every single scientist or researcher - from countries all over the world - who publishes research that is critical of vaccines.
Followers of this page, of Vaccine Guide, and of many other prominent, outspoken critics of the vaccine establishment, know that there is more than enough published scientific research and evidence otherwise to prove that vaccines are neither safe, nor effective.
Unfortunately, this research hardly ever sees the light of day because the CDC and the mainstream media (more than they care to do their due diligence and put the health and welfare of the people first) are mouthpieces for the industry.
The CDC owns patents on vaccines, and shuffles personnel back and forth between the vaccine manufacturers and themselves to maintain control of the information that is disseminated to medical professionals (for example, Julie Gerberding, who was the director of the CDC. After the CDC published their fraudulent study on the MMR vaccine under her lead, she landed a job at Merck - maker of the MMR vaccine - as the director of their vaccine division).
The news media simply receives far too much funding via advertising revenue from the pharmaceutical industry to be critical of the vaccine paradigm, nor give any credit to anyone questioning vaccine safety. Repeating the mantra “vaccines are safe and effective”, and “another outbreak caused by anti-vaxxers” is the... safe and effective thing for them to do... in order to maintain their financial stability.
Therefore, the weight of this debate comes back onto the researchers themselves to stand against the entire vaccine industry-government-media complex.
(PRAY for them. Donate. Share their work. Support them. In whatever way you can.)
Sadly, anyone who attempts to publish research that exposes the toxicity of vaccine ingredients or the harm that can come from vaccination - regardless of the extent of their education and qualifications - is promptly slandered and accused of being a “quack”. (Watch “Doctored” to learn where that term originated from.)
On the other hand, we are expected to be comfortable with the industry ties to the CDC, to accept all of the research funded by the vaccine manufacturers and industry-influenced agencies - as IRREFUTABLE - and to assume that all research conducted by independent parties which contradicts that research, is completely bogus.
I personally find it unreasonable to expect people to put their trust in the science conducted with funding from vaccine manufacturers who have been convicted of fraud. The research that gets accepted and published as credible and then subsequently shared as proof of vaccine safety, when the manipulation of the data is as plain as day, is mind-blowing. (For example, there are studies claiming vaccines during pregnancy are safe, when the researchers eliminated negative outcomes - like the death of the unborn child - from their results!)
I find it unreasonable to put my trust in the CDC, whose own senior scientists have attempted to blow the whistle on the fraudulent activity within the agency... that, according to the scientists, exists not as an uncommon occurrence, but as a standard of conduct.
I find it unreasonable to expect people to just trust their doctors, when doctors do not learn about vaccine ingredients nor their toxicity in medical school (which is again, funded by the pharmaceutical industry btw), and when all of their recommendations and information comes straight from the CDC. (Doctors tend to trust the CDC...)
And - I find it unreasonable to trust what the news media says, when they almost always censor anyone who has something intelligent to say regarding the harmful effects of vaccines (I have first-hand experience with this.)
When it comes down to it, I am BAFFLED that research conducted and funded by the vaccine manufacturers is considered “credible”!! Let alone - irrefutable.
But this is our reality.
The only reason I continue to speak out about this issue is because I want every child to be healthy and enjoy life. I want parents to be equipped with the information necessary to make an informed decision. As parents, we cannot make decisions that will allow our children to live their best life, if we are only being given the whitewashed and manipulated “science” from the industry (it’s advertising, really), which gets filtered down to pediatricians through the CDC as truth and fact.
Please question what you know about vaccines and realize that this is a 50+ BILLION dollar per year industry and is far surpassing the growth of regular pharmaceuticals.
Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge
Physicians for Informed Consent
Learn The Risk
The HighWire with Del Bigtree
Stop Mandatory Vaccination
Example of a CDC “safety study”: https://facebook.com/story/graphql_permalink/…