|
Tucker Carlson recently sat down with Evolutionary Biologist, Bret Weinstein, PhD in a 59 minute interview that gives a clear, comprehensive summary of the Covid-19 pandemic, what Dr. Weinstein calls "the game of pharma" and the W.H.O. Pandemic Treaty, aka "The World Health Organization Pandemic Preparedness Plan." Dr. Weinstein offers a hypothesis for why things evolved as they did and for where we're headed. I urge you to listen to the interview (or read the transcript); learn more about the W.H.O. Pandemic Treaty; share this interview with at least one other person; and as always, pray that truth "will be brought to light and made known to all."  Bret Weinstein, PhD & Tucker Carlson Click image for interview video and print transcript. As Brownstone Institute's, Jefferey Tucker, states in his commentary for Children's Health Defense, "The COVID-19 response was a fiasco for the ages, and it was never about public health, even if that was the rhetorical cover. It was about profits and power, a terrible truth that the public is going to be dealing with for many years to come..." "Nobody wants to be thinking about COVID anymore. It was a traumatic and exhausting experience. I don’t want to be thinking about COVID anymore either. But what I find is that every time I look away and move on to other topics, things move just out of our sightline and these things couldn’t possibly be more important. So I’m going to try to explain where we are and how we got here and what the implications are in the present that people are largely not noticing." "I’m now going to put a hypothesis on the table about why things unfolded the way they did. And it involves that game of pharma...And again, this is not certain, but what I’ve pieced together is that pharma owned what was potentially the biggest pharmacological cash cow conceivable. It owned a beautiful technology and I mean that sincerely, something truly brilliant that would potentially not only allow a bright future from the perspective of creating new treatments and new — I hesitate to use the word vaccine because it doesn’t really apply — but new vaccine-like technologies, but that it could do this indefinitely into the future and it could allow you to reformulate every vaccine currently on the market." "I still believe deeply in the elegance of vaccines as they should exist, but I’m now very alarmed at how they are produced, and I’m even more alarmed at what has been called a vaccine that doesn’t meet the definition. That because many of us believe that vaccines were an extremely elegant, low-harm, high-efficacy method of preventing disease. When they called this mRNA tech technology a vaccine, many of us gave it more credibility than we should have if they had called it a gene transfection technology. We would have thought, wait, what? You know that that’s that sounds highly novel and it sounds dangerous. And how much do we know about the long-term implications? But because they called it a vaccine, people were much readily, much more willing to accept it." "But they, the World Health Organization and its signatory nations will be allowed to define a public health emergency. Any basis that having declared one, they will be entitled to mandate remedies. Remedies that are named include vaccines. Gene therapy technology is literally named in the set of things that the World Health Organization is going to reserve the right to mandate, that it will be in a position to require these things of citizens, that it will be in a position to dictate our ability to travel, in other words, passports that would be predicated on one having accepted these technologies are clearly being described. It would have the ability to forbid the use of other medications...So this looks like they’re preparing for a rerun where they can just simply take ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine off the table. They also have reserved the ability. Dictate how these measures are discussed. That censorship is described here as well, the right to dictate that." "I literally cannot understand how I would sleep at night, how I would look at myself in the mirror if I didn’t say what needed to be said." - Bret Weinstein, PhD -
0 Comments
 When it comes to vaccine injury awareness, informed consent and vaccine choice, no one has done more or fought harder or longer for the rights of parents and children than Barbara Loe Fisher and the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) which Barbara co-founded with Kathi Williams in 1982 under the name Dissatisfied Parents Together. Barbara was there when the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was passed by Congress. The following HighWire interview with Barbara tells the whole story about the 1986 Act and more; and is, perhaps, the most powerful HighWire episode to date. Please take time to watch the interview, read the supporting facts, and share with others.  Click image for interview. The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created by members of Congress after more than four years of deliberation with vaccine stakeholders, including parents of vaccine injured children, medical trade associations, public health agencies, vaccine manufacturers, and Administration officials, was signed into law as part of an Omnibus health bill by President Ronald Reagan on Nov. 14, 1986. The Act’s provisions specifically applied to federally licensed and recommended vaccines for children routinely mandated by states for school attendance. Read more. Watch interview. “There is no justice in the compensation program. It’s a joke. It’s a cruel joke. It’s an imitation, a poor imitation of a court trial in Washington DC, in the U.S. Court of Special Claims.” “…every admission, every award, is an admission that vaccines can do that; and that’s been the biggest problem because no one wants to acknowledge in the system, wants to acknowledge the extent of the problem with vaccine injury and death… so it’s minimize, cover-up, deny.” |
Author"Why I started researching vaccines." Archives
August 2024
Categories
All
|
RSS Feed